David L. Schriger
Care of the patient is guided by integration of the chief complaint, history, vital signs, and physical examination findings (Chapter 6). Physicians should be keenly aware of a patient's vital signs but should seldom make them the centerpiece of the evaluation.THE IMPORTANCE OF VITAL SIGNSThe
importance of vital signs in medical care is a conundrum for proponents
of an evidence-based approach to care of patients. No experienced
physician would be willing to care for patients without them, yet a
formal evaluation of the utility of vital signs for making specific
diagnoses would conclude that they are not particularly useful because
their likelihood ratios are too low to differentiate those who have a
condition from those who do not (Chapter 6).
For uncommon conditions, their predictive value is even worse. For
example, the probability of tachycardia in a patient in thyroid storm is
high, yet the probability of thyroid storm in a patient with isolated
tachycardia is low. This application of Bayes' theorem (Chapter 9)
demonstrates why there is no justification for ordering thyroid tests
for every tachycardic patient and why attempts to say “When vital sign x is high [low], do y” fail. Each vital sign can be normal or abnormal in almost every acute condition (Table 7-1),
and vital signs can be transiently abnormal in healthy individuals. An
algorithmic approach to testing and treatment in response to abnormal
vital signs would be too vague and too complex to be of use.Normal | Panic | |
---|---|---|
Temperature | 36–38°C (96.8–100.4°F) | 40°C (104°F) |
Pulse | 60 to 100 per minute | <45 per minute, >130 per minute |
Respirations | 12 to 20 per minute | <10 per minute, >26 per minute |
Oxygen saturation | 95–100% | <90% |
Systolic blood | 90–130 mm Hg pressure | <80 mm Hg, >200 mm Hg |
Diastolic blood pressure | 60–90 mm Hg | <55 mm Hg, >120 mm Hg |
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario